Islam Academy

Dawud al-Zahiri

داود الظاهري

Abu Sulayman

Abu Sulayman Dawud ibn Ali ibn Khalaf al-Isfahani, known as Dawud al-Zahiri (born in Kufa, probably in 200 AH / 815–816 CE, with 202 AH / 817–818 also reported; died in Ramadan 270 AH / March 884 in Baghdad), was the founder of the legal tradition later known as the Zahiri school. Born into a family of Isfahani origin, he studied in Basra and Baghdad with leading hadith scholars and jurists including Abu Thawr, Sulayman ibn Harb, Amr ibn Marzuq and others, then travelled to Nishapur to study with Ishaq ibn Rahwayh. Dawud was initially strongly attached to al-Shafii’s jurisprudence, although he could not have been a direct student of al-Shafii because of their chronology. He eventually concluded that the arguments al-Shafii used against istihsan also undermined qiyas, and he rejected analogical reasoning as an independent source of law. His method emphasized the manifest linguistic meaning of Qurʾan and hadith, rejected taqlid, sharply restricted ijma to the Companions, and resisted extending revealed rulings to new cases by identifying unwritten effective causes. Later Zahiri theory systematized these positions further. Modern reconstruction of Dawud’s own method is necessarily cautious because none of his roughly 150 listed works survives intact. Titles attributed to him include Ibtal al-qiyas, Ibtal al-taqlid, Kitab al-Usul, al-Idah and major works defending hadith and the Sunnah. Reports that Ahmad ibn Hanbal refused to receive him because of claims concerning the createdness or temporal occurrence of the Qurʾan are part of the classical biographical record, but the exact formulation of Dawud’s theological position is disputed and should not be reduced to the simple claim that he regarded the Qurʾan itself as created. Dawud taught in Baghdad to a large circle; al-Tabari attended his lessons, transmitted hadith from him and later disputed some of his legal positions. The school was initially called Dawudiyya, spread in Iraq and other regions, and later achieved its most systematic surviving expression through Ibn Hazm in al-Andalus. Dawud died in Baghdad and was buried in the Shuniziyya cemetery.

815 — 884

Names and variants

Dawud al-Zahiri· canonicalDawud al-Zahiri· canonicalداود الظاهري· canonicalDawud ibn Ali ibn Khalaf· birth nameداود بن علي بن خلف· birth nameAbu Sulayman· kunyaأبو سليمان· kunyaal-Isfahani· nisbaالإصفهاني· nisbaal-Zahiri· nisbaالظاهري· nisbaDawud ibn Ali al-Isfahani· variantDâvûd ez-Zâhirî· transliterationDaoud al-Zahiri· variant

Dawud al-Zahiri

Dawud al-Zahiri was a major ninth-century jurist, hadith scholar and founder of the legal tradition later known as the Zahiri school.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

Full name

His full name was Abu Sulayman Dawud ibn Ali ibn Khalaf al-Isfahani.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

Kunya and nisbas

His kunya was Abu Sulayman. Al-Isfahani referred to his family origin, while al-Zahiri became associated with his method of adhering to the manifest meaning of revealed texts.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

Probable birth in 200 AH

The principal chronology places his birth in 200 AH / 815–816 CE.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

The 202 AH alternative

Biographical sources also report 202 AH / 817–818 CE. The exact birth year therefore remains less secure than his death date.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

Born in Kufa

Dawud was born in Kufa, one of the major intellectual centers of Abbasid Iraq.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

A family of Isfahani origin

His family was remembered as originating from Isfahan, which explains the nisba al-Isfahani.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

Family background

His father Ali ibn Khalaf belonged to an Iraqi scholarly environment often described as initially closer to Hanafi legal culture. Dawud later moved decisively toward hadith-oriented jurisprudence.

Sources: [1] Identity, family and chronology, [2] Identity, family and chronology, [3] Identity, family and chronology, [7] Identity, family and chronology

Study in Basra

Dawud studied in Basra with important hadith transmitters including Sulayman ibn Harb, Amr ibn Marzuq and others.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

Study in Baghdad

Baghdad became the main center of his intellectual formation and later his teaching career.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

Abu Thawr

Abu Thawr was one of the most important jurists from whom Dawud studied and helped connect him to the Shafii-oriented legal milieu of Baghdad.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

Strong early Shafii influence

Dawud was initially a strong admirer of al-Shafii’s jurisprudence and defense of hadith, but he did not study directly with al-Shafii because he was born only shortly before al-Shafii’s death.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

Ishaq ibn Rahwayh

Dawud travelled to Nishapur to attend the lessons of Ishaq ibn Rahwayh, one of the leading hadith-oriented jurists of the period.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

Nishapur

His stay in Nishapur exposed him to eastern hadith scholarship and became an important stage in the development of his independent method.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

A broad hadith-oriented teacher network

His teachers included Abu Thawr, Sulayman ibn Harb, Amr ibn Marzuq, al-Qanabi, Musaddad ibn Musarhad and Ishaq ibn Rahwayh.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

Return to Baghdad

After his studies Dawud returned to Baghdad, where he taught, issued legal opinions and attracted a substantial following.

Sources: [2] Education and scholarly formation, [3] Education and scholarly formation, [7] Education and scholarly formation, [10] Education and scholarly formation

A large teaching circle

Biographical works report roughly four hundred students attending his teaching sessions. This figure illustrates his fame but remains a traditional estimate.

Sources: [1] Teaching and hadith authority, [3] Teaching and hadith authority, [4] Teaching and hadith authority, [7] Teaching and hadith authority

A sought-after jurist

People from distant regions reportedly consulted Dawud on legal questions, showing that his school was not merely a marginal private theory during his lifetime.

Sources: [1] Teaching and hadith authority, [3] Teaching and hadith authority, [4] Teaching and hadith authority, [7] Teaching and hadith authority

Hadith scholarship

Dawud knew and taught a large body of hadith, although relatively few reports were later transmitted directly through his own students.

Sources: [1] Teaching and hadith authority, [3] Teaching and hadith authority, [4] Teaching and hadith authority, [7] Teaching and hadith authority

Rejection of qiyas

Dawud rejected analogical reasoning as an independent method for extending legal rulings beyond the cases addressed by revelation.

Sources: [6] Zahiri legal method, [7] Zahiri legal method, [9] Zahiri legal method, [10] Zahiri legal method

Rejection of unrestricted personal opinion

His method also opposed raʾy when it meant creating legal rules through personal reasoning not anchored in the wording or authorized indications of revelation.

Sources: [6] Zahiri legal method, [7] Zahiri legal method, [9] Zahiri legal method, [10] Zahiri legal method

Rejection of taqlid

Dawud rejected blind adherence to the opinion of a jurist and insisted that legal judgments be tied back to evidence.

Sources: [6] Zahiri legal method, [7] Zahiri legal method, [9] Zahiri legal method, [10] Zahiri legal method

A restricted conception of ijma

Dawud restricted binding consensus to the consensus of the Companions, rejecting broader later claims of consensus as independently binding.

Sources: [6] Zahiri legal method, [7] Zahiri legal method, [9] Zahiri legal method, [10] Zahiri legal method

The manifest meaning of the texts

The defining feature of his method was to give controlling weight to the manifest linguistic meaning of Qurʾan and authentic hadith unless another textual indication required a different reading.

Sources: [6] Zahiri legal method, [7] Zahiri legal method, [9] Zahiri legal method, [10] Zahiri legal method

Language rather than hidden effective causes

Zahiri reasoning did not mean ignoring language or context. It sought meaning through wording and linguistic indication while rejecting the invention of hidden legal causes used to transfer rulings by analogy.

Sources: [6] Zahiri legal method, [7] Zahiri legal method, [9] Zahiri legal method, [10] Zahiri legal method

Commands, prohibitions and permissibility

The Zahiri framework treated explicit commands and prohibitions as central and left matters not covered by binding commands or prohibitions within the field of original permissibility.

Sources: [6] Zahiri legal method, [7] Zahiri legal method, [9] Zahiri legal method, [10] Zahiri legal method

The debated concept of dalil

Later reconstructions describe Dawud’s “dalil” as a set of textual and linguistic indications rather than ordinary qiyas. Because his own works are lost, the exact boundaries of this method remain partly reconstructed.

Sources: [5] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology, [6] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology, [9] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology

Original permissibility and continuity

Modern study of his method suggests that when neither explicit wording nor authorized implication supplied a ruling, Dawud relied on the continuity of the original state, including permissibility.

Sources: [5] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology, [6] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology, [9] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology

Did Dawud accept “clear analogy”?

Some later authors claimed Dawud accepted a form of obvious or clear analogy. Other sources and modern analysis caution that the disputed examples may reflect linguistic implication rather than technical qiyas.

Sources: [5] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology, [6] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology, [9] Dalil and anti-qiyas methodology

Dawud and Ahmad ibn Hanbal

Dawud and Ahmad shared a strong orientation toward hadith and ascetic scholarly ideals, but a theological controversy prevented a simple relationship of intellectual continuity.

Sources: [3] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [7] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [10] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal

The disputed Qurʾan formulation

Classical reports attribute to Dawud formulations distinguishing the uncreated divine Qurʾan from created human copies, pronunciation or temporal manifestation. The precise wording and theological meaning are transmitted inconsistently.

Sources: [3] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [7] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [10] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal

Ahmad’s reported refusal to receive him

Classical biographical sources report that Ahmad ibn Hanbal refused to meet Dawud after hearing these theological reports. The episode is well attested as a biographical tradition, even though the underlying doctrinal formulation remains disputed.

Sources: [3] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [7] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [10] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal

Engagement in disputation

Dawud was remembered as skilled in argument and disputation, and his legal writings show sustained engagement with theoretical questions rather than simple anti-intellectual literalism.

Sources: [3] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [7] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal, [10] Theological controversy and Ahmad ibn Hanbal

Ascetic reputation

Biographical works praise his piety, restraint and ascetic habits alongside his legal learning.

Sources: [1] Character and disputation, [3] Character and disputation, [7] Character and disputation

A formidable debater

Sources portray Dawud as unusually capable in formal argument and as one of the few students willing to debate Ishaq ibn Rahwayh openly.

Sources: [1] Character and disputation, [3] Character and disputation, [7] Character and disputation

Students and transmitters

His students included his son Muhammad and a wider Baghdad circle that transmitted his legal positions even after his books disappeared.

Sources: [3] Students and succession, [6] Students and succession, [7] Students and succession

Muhammad ibn Dawud

Dawud’s son Muhammad became the second major imam of the school and helped continue its Baghdad transmission after his father’s death.

Sources: [3] Students and succession, [6] Students and succession, [7] Students and succession

Al-Tabari: student and later critic

Al-Tabari attended Dawud’s lessons and transmitted hadith from him, then later challenged his opinions and began a refutation of Zahiri positions before stopping it after Dawud’s death.

Sources: [1] Al-Tabari as student and later critic, [8] Al-Tabari as student and later critic, [10] Al-Tabari as student and later critic

From Dawudiyya to Zahiriyya

The movement was initially named Dawudiyya after its founder and only later became widely known as the Zahiriyya.

Sources: [6] Zahiri school history and legacy, [7] Zahiri school history and legacy, [9] Zahiri school history and legacy, [10] Zahiri school history and legacy

A Baghdad legal school

During and after Dawud’s lifetime the school had a real teaching network in Baghdad rather than existing only as an abstract set of doctrines.

Sources: [6] Zahiri school history and legacy, [7] Zahiri school history and legacy, [9] Zahiri school history and legacy, [10] Zahiri school history and legacy

Spread in Iraq and the eastern Islamic world

Zahiri teaching found followers in Iraq and parts of the eastern Islamic world, including Transoxiana, though it never achieved the institutional strength of the four later dominant Sunni schools.

Sources: [6] Zahiri school history and legacy, [7] Zahiri school history and legacy, [9] Zahiri school history and legacy, [10] Zahiri school history and legacy

North Africa and al-Andalus

The school also reached North Africa and al-Andalus, where later scholars preserved and transformed the Zahiri tradition.

Sources: [6] Zahiri school history and legacy, [7] Zahiri school history and legacy, [9] Zahiri school history and legacy, [10] Zahiri school history and legacy

The later importance of Ibn Hazm

Centuries later Ibn Hazm became the most systematic surviving exponent of Zahiri jurisprudence. His writings preserve and reformulate many principles associated with Dawud, but they should not automatically be projected back onto Dawud in every detail.

Sources: [6] Zahiri school history and legacy, [7] Zahiri school history and legacy, [9] Zahiri school history and legacy, [10] Zahiri school history and legacy

Institutional decline

The Zahiri school gradually lost institutional ground to better-established Sunni madhhab networks, although Zahiri arguments continued to appear in legal debate.

Sources: [6] Zahiri school history and legacy, [7] Zahiri school history and legacy, [9] Zahiri school history and legacy, [10] Zahiri school history and legacy

Doctrinal survival beyond the school

Even after the school’s institutional decline, debates over qiyas, taqlid, consensus and textual meaning kept Dawud’s legal challenge relevant to later usul al-fiqh.

Sources: [6] Zahiri school history and legacy, [7] Zahiri school history and legacy, [9] Zahiri school history and legacy, [10] Zahiri school history and legacy

A prolific but lost corpus

Ibn al-Nadim and later bibliographers list roughly 150 works under Dawud’s name, although some titles may represent subdivisions or shorter treatises.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

Works on legal theory

The attributed corpus included numerous writings on usul al-fiqh, general and specific language, reports transmitted by single authorities, consensus and the grounds of legal proof.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

Ibtal al-qiyas

A work titled Ibtal al-qiyas is attributed to Dawud and reflects the principle for which his school became most famous: denial of analogical reasoning as an independent legal proof.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

Ibtal al-taqlid

A separate work titled Ibtal al-taqlid is listed among his writings, matching the Zahiri insistence that juristic authority must remain accountable to evidence.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

Al-Idah and al-Ifsah

Large works titled al-Idah and al-Ifsah are listed in the bibliographical tradition and appear to have covered wide areas of law and legal theory.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

Defense of Sunnah and reports

Titles attributed to Dawud include works defending Sunnah and transmitted reports against competing legal and theological arguments.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

An early biography of al-Shafii

Bibliographical scholarship credits Dawud with an early biography of al-Shafii, often described in modern scholarship as the first major biography devoted to a Muslim jurist. The work itself is lost.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

No complete work survives

None of Dawud’s known works survives intact, so his doctrine must be reconstructed from quotations, descriptions and the writings of students, critics and later Zahiris.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

Reconstructing Dawud through later transmitters

Later jurists, especially within the Zahiri tradition, preserved many individual rulings and theoretical positions attributed to Dawud, but later systematization must be distinguished from his own wording.

Sources: [7] Works and textual transmission, [9] Works and textual transmission, [10] Works and textual transmission, [11] Works and textual transmission

Death in Ramadan 270 AH

Dawud died in Baghdad in Ramadan 270 AH / March 884 CE.

Sources: [1] Death, reputation and source criticism, [3] Death, reputation and source criticism, [7] Death, reputation and source criticism, [10] Death, reputation and source criticism

Burial in Shuniziyya

He was buried in the Shuniziyya cemetery in Baghdad.

Sources: [1] Death, reputation and source criticism, [3] Death, reputation and source criticism, [7] Death, reputation and source criticism, [10] Death, reputation and source criticism

A controversial but major jurist

Dawud’s rejection of qiyas made him controversial among later jurists, yet his large teaching circle, extensive writings and lasting school show that he occupied a significant place in ninth-century legal debate.

Sources: [1] Death, reputation and source criticism, [3] Death, reputation and source criticism, [7] Death, reputation and source criticism, [10] Death, reputation and source criticism

A legacy requiring careful reconstruction

Because Dawud’s books are lost and much of the surviving evidence comes from followers or opponents, his own views should be separated from later Zahiri systematization, hostile caricature and retrospective school identity.

Sources: [1] Death, reputation and source criticism, [3] Death, reputation and source criticism, [7] Death, reputation and source criticism, [10] Death, reputation and source criticism

Source-sensitive points

probable

The principal biographical chronology places Dawud al-Zahiri’s birth in 200 AH / 815–816 CE.

Sources: [2] Hadith-biographical chronology, [3] Classical chronology, [7] 200 AH principal birth date

reported

Some biographical sources instead give 202 AH / 817–818 CE for Dawud’s birth.

Sources: [1] Variant chronology, [2] Biographical variant, [7] 202 AH alternative

established

Dawud was born in Kufa to a family remembered as being of Isfahani origin.

Sources: [2] Identity, [3] Baghdad biography, [7] Isfahani family origin and Kufan birth

established

Abu Thawr was one of the important jurists from whom Dawud studied.

Sources: [2] Teacher network, [7] Abu Thawr among teachers, [10] Shafii-oriented formation

established

Dawud travelled to Nishapur to study with Ishaq ibn Rahwayh.

Sources: [1] Classical biography, [7] Journey to Nishapur for Ishaq, [10] Eastern traditionalist formation

established

Dawud was strongly influenced by al-Shafii’s legal thought and defense of hadith, but chronology excludes a direct teacher-student relationship between them.

Sources: [7] Initial strong Shafii affiliation, [9] Zahiri origins, [10] Development from Shafii legal thought

established

Dawud rejected qiyas as an independent method of extending legal rulings beyond the cases addressed by revelation.

Sources: [6] Defining Zahiri principle, [7] Complete rejection of qiyas, [9] Anti-qiyas legal theory

established

Dawud rejected blind taqlid and required juristic judgments to remain accountable to evidence.

Sources: [6] Anti-taqlid principle, [7] Ibtal al-taqlid and doctrine, [9] Zahiri legal authority

established

Dawud restricted binding ijma to the consensus of the Companions.

Sources: [6] Zahiri consensus doctrine, [7] Ijma limited to Companions, [9] Legal theory

established

Dawud was the founder of the legal tradition later known as the Zahiri school.

Sources: [6] Systematization begins with Dawud, [7] Founder of Zahiri school, [10] Personal-school formation

established

The early school was initially known as the Dawudiyya before the name Zahiriyya became dominant.

Sources: [6] Early name Dawudiyya, [9] School naming history, [10] Personal school development

probable

Modern reconstruction suggests that Dawud’s concept of dalil relied on textual and linguistic indication rather than ordinary analogical qiyas.

Sources: [5] Reconstruction of dalil method, [6] Debate over clear analogy and textual implication, [9] Zahiri terminology

reported

Classical sources report that Ahmad ibn Hanbal refused to receive Dawud after hearing reports about Dawud’s formulation concerning the Qurʾan.

Sources: [3] Classical Baghdad narrative, [7] Ahmad refused Dawud’s visit, [10] Qurʾan controversy

disputed

The exact theological formulation attributed to Dawud concerning the createdness, pronunciation or temporal occurrence of the Qurʾan is transmitted inconsistently and remains disputed.

Sources: [3] Classical report, [7] Conflicting formulations in sources, [10] Doctrinal reconstruction

reported

Biographical works report that roughly four hundred students attended Dawud’s teaching sessions.

Sources: [1] Classical biography, [3] Teaching reputation, [7] Approximately 400 attendees

reported

Ibn al-Nadim and later bibliographers list roughly one hundred and fifty works under Dawud’s name, though some entries may represent subdivisions or short treatises.

Sources: [7] About 150 works listed, [10] Early legal literature, [11] Bibliographical titles

established

None of Dawud’s known works survives intact, so his legal theory must be reconstructed from later quotations and transmission.

Sources: [7] No complete work survives, [9] Reconstructed doctrine, [11] Bibliographical corpus

reported

Bibliographical scholarship credits Dawud with an early biography of al-Shafii, often described in modern scholarship as the first major biography devoted to a Muslim jurist.

Sources: [9] Dawud and Shafii tradition, [10] Modern identification as earliest major jurist biography, [11] Early Shafii biography attribution

established

The Zahiri school developed a real teaching network in Baghdad and later found followers in Iraq, the eastern Islamic world, North Africa and al-Andalus.

Sources: [6] School diffusion and later Ibn Hazm, [7] Baghdad and later regional spread, [9] History of Zahiri movement

established

Dawud al-Zahiri died in Baghdad in Ramadan 270 AH / March 884 CE and was buried in the Shuniziyya cemetery.

Sources: [2] Classical chronology, [3] Death in Baghdad, [7] Ramadan 270 AH / March 884

Relationships

Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal

other · reported

Imam al-Tabari

student · established

Imam al-Tabari

opponent · established

Contributions

Founder of the Zahiri legal tradition

Dawud transformed a strong hadith-oriented suspicion of raʾy into a distinct legal school centered on the manifest meaning of revelation and rejection of analogical qiyas.

scholarly · established

A radical critic of qiyas and taqlid

His rejection of analogy and blind adherence forced later jurists to articulate more precisely why and how non-textual juristic reasoning could be authoritative.

scholarly · established

An important early contributor to usul al-fiqh

Although his books are lost, the titles and reconstructed contents of his works show sustained writing on consensus, reports, linguistic generality and specificity, legal proof and juristic authority.

scholarly · established

A Baghdad bridge between hadith scholarship and legal theory

His education under major traditionists and his own large teaching circle made his school an important part of ninth-century Baghdad’s transition from regional legal cultures to personal madhhabs.

scholarly · established

A long afterlife through Ibn Hazm and later legal debate

The school declined institutionally, but its arguments survived through Ibn Hazm and through later debates over qiyas, consensus, taqlid and the authority of literal textual meaning.

scholarly · established

Sources

  1. [1]
    Siyar aʿlām al-nubalāʾ

    al-Dhahabī · Classical biographical source

  2. [2]
    Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb

    Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī · Classical biographical source

  3. [3]
    Tārīkh Baghdād

    al-Khatib al-Baghdadi · Classical biographical source

  4. [4]
    Tadhkirat al-ḥuffāẓ

    al-Dhahabi · Classical hadith-biographical source

  5. [5]
    DÂVÛD EZ-ZÂHİRÎ’NİN USÛLÜNE HAS YÖNÜYLE “DELİL”

    Mustafa Türkan · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi · 2017

  6. [6]
    ZÂHİRİYYE

    H. Yunus Apaydın · TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi · 2013

  7. [7]
    DÂVÛD ez-ZÂHİRÎ

    Nûreddîn Itr · TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi · 1994

  8. [8]
    TABERÎ, Muhammed b. Cerîr

    Mustafa Fayda · TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi · 2010

  9. [9]
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    al-Fihrist

    Ibn al-Nadim · Classical bibliographical source

Back